You obviously did not research on who Matthew Dillon is, otherwise you
would know that he has plenty of real world experience.  The guy wrote
a packet rate controller inspired by basic laws of physics, give him
credit instead of being rude.

Time will tell whether he was wrong about his arguments on PCI-X or not,
and whether our effort with DragonFly is just plain useless; but there
is absolutely no need for animosity on the lists.

Should you wish to continue debating performance issues then do so with
a civil manner.

Kind regards,

-- 
Hiten Pandya
hmp at dragonflybsd.org

Danial Thom wrote:
quoted text
> You obviously have forgotten the original premise
> of this (which is how do we get past the "wall"
> of UP networking performance), and you also
> obviously have no practical experience with
> heavily utilized network devices, because you
> seem to have no grasp on the real issues. 
> 
> Being smart is not about knowing everything; its
> about recognizing when you don't and making an
> effort to learn. I seem to remember you saying
> that there was no performance advantage to PCI-X
> as well not so long ago. Its really quite amazing
> to me that you can continue to stick to arguments
> that are so easily provable to be wrong. Perhaps
> someday you'll trade in your slide rule and get
> yourself a good test bed. College is over. Time
> to enter reality, where the results are almost
> never whole numbers.
>