Re: When will ZFS become stable?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Vadim Goncharov
Date: Monday, January 7, 2008 - 4:28 pm

07.01.08 @ 21:39 Robert Watson wrote:


No, i didn't do that yet. Brief search, however, shows kern/118432, though  
it is not directly kmem issue, and also thread  
http://209.85.135.104/search?q=cache:lpXLlrtojg8J:archive.netbsd.se/%3Fml%3Dfreebsd-ne...  
in which memory exhaustion problem was predicted. Also, I've heard some  
rumors about ng_nat memory panics under very heavy load, but a man with  
300Mbps router with several ng_nat's said his router is rock stable for  
half a year - though his router has 1 Gb of RAM and mine only 256 Mb (BTW,  
it's his system that has crashed recently with kern/118993, but this is  
not ng_nat kmem issue, as I think).


Yes, I've known it, but didn't known what column names exactly mean.  
Requests/Failures, I guess, is a pure statistics, Size is one element  
size, but why USED + FREE != LIMIT (on whose where limit is non-zero) ?


Last time I've tried it on 5.4 it caused panics every several hours on my  
fileserver, so I thought this feature is not of wide use...


So, is the kernel memory map global thing that covers entire kernel or  
there several maps in kernel, say, one for malloc(), one for other UMA,  
etc. ? Recalling sysctl values from my previous message:

vm.kmem_size: 83415040
vm.kmem_size_max: 335544320
vm.kmem_size_scale: 3
vm.kvm_size: 1073737728
vm.kvm_free: 704638976

So, kvm_size looks like amount of KVA_PAGES, covering entire kernel  
address space, plugged to every process' address space. But more than 300  
megs are used, while machine has only 256 Mb of RAM. I see line in top:

Mem: 41M Active, 1268K Inact, 102M Wired, 34M Buf, 94M Free

I guess 34M buffer cache is entirely in-kernel memory, is this part of  
kmem_size or another part of kernel space? What does kmem_size_max and  
kmem_size_scale do - can kmem grow dynamically? Does kmem_size of about 80  
megs mean that 80 megs of RAM is constantly used by kernel for it's needs,  
including buffer cache, and other 176 megs are spent for processes RSS, or  
relation is more complicated?


We can assume for simplicty that their memoru is not-so-kernel but part of  
process address space :)


Umm. I think there is no point in swapping disk cache which can be  
discarded, so the most actual part of kernel memory which is swappable are  
anonymous pipe(2) buffers?


OK, here are the zone state from the crash dump:

router:~# vmstat -z -M /var/crash/vmcore.32
ITEM                     SIZE     LIMIT      USED      FREE  REQUESTS   
FAILURES

UMA Kegs:                 140,        0,       88,        8,        
88,        0
UMA Zones:                120,        0,       88,        2,        
88,        0
UMA Slabs:                 64,        0,     5020,       54,  
15454953,        0
UMA RCntSlabs:            104,        0,     1500,      165,   
1443452,        0
UMA Hash:                 128,        0,        3,       27,         
6,        0
16 Bucket:                 76,        0,       19,       31,        
34,        0
32 Bucket:                140,        0,       24,        4,        
58,        0
64 Bucket:                268,        0,       14,       28,       
125,      177
128 Bucket:               524,        0,      449,       97,   415988,    
109049
VM OBJECT:                132,        0,     2124,    13217,  
37014938,        0
MAP:                      192,        0,        7,       33,         
7,        0
KMAP ENTRY:                68,    15512,       24,     2440,  
67460011,        0
MAP ENTRY:                 68,        0,     1141,      483,  
67039931,        0
PV ENTRY:                  24,   452400,    25801,    23499,  
784683549,        0
DP fakepg:                 72,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
mt_zone:                   64,        0,      237,       58,       
237,        0
16:                        16,        0,     2691,      354,  
21894973014,        0
32:                        32,        0,     2281,      318,  
35838274034,        0
64:                        64,        0,     6098,     1454,  
172769061,        0
128:                      128,        0,   243914,    16846,  
637135440,        4
256:                      256,        0,      978,      222,  
134799637,        0
512:                      512,        0,      196,      116,   
3216246,        0
1024:                    1024,        0,       67,       73,    
366070,        0
2048:                    2048,        0,     8988,       46,  
69855367,        7
4096:                    4096,        0,      155,       29,   
1894695,        0
Files:                     72,        0,      270,      207,  
31790371,        0
PROC:                     536,        0,       96,       37,   
1567418,        0
THREAD:                   376,        0,      142,        8,  
14326845,        0
KSEGRP:                    88,        0,      137,       63,       
662,        0
UPCALL:                    44,        0,        6,      150,       
536,        0
VMSPACE:                  296,        0,       48,       56,   
1567372,        0
audit_record:             828,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
mbuf_packet:              256,        0,      591,      121,  
208413611538,        0
mbuf:                     256,        0,     1902,     1226,  
202203273445,        0
mbuf_cluster:            2048,     8768,     2537,      463,  
5247493815,        2
mbuf_jumbo_pagesize:     4096,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
mbuf_jumbo_9k:           9216,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
mbuf_jumbo_16k:         16384,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
ACL UMA zone:             388,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
NetGraph items:            36,      546,        0,      546,  
251943928450,  1170428
g_bio:                    132,        0,        1,      231,  
336628343,        0
ata_request:              204,        0,        1,      316,  
82269680,        0
ata_composite:            196,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
VNODE:                    272,        0,     2039,    14523,  
40154724,        0
VNODEPOLL:                 76,        0,        0,       50,         
1,        0
S VFS Cache:               68,        0,     2247,    12929,  
41383752,        0
L VFS Cache:              291,        0,        0,      364,    
536802,        0
NAMEI:                   1024,        0,      372,       12,  
126634007,        0
NFSMOUNT:                 480,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
NFSNODE:                  460,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
DIRHASH:                 1024,        0,      156,      184,    
131252,        0
PIPE:                     408,        0,       24,       30,    
822603,        0
KNOTE:                     68,        0,        0,      112,    
249530,        0
bridge_rtnode:             32,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
socket:                   356,     8778,       75,       35,   
1488596,        0
ipq:                       32,      339,        0,      226,  
58472202,        0
udpcb:                    180,     8778,       17,       49,    
239035,        0
inpcb:                    180,     8778,       23,      109,    
676919,        0
tcpcb:                    464,     8768,       22,       34,    
676919,        0
tcptw:                     48,     1794,        1,      233,    
177851,        0
syncache:                 100,    15366,        0,       78,    
610893,        0
hostcache:                 76,    15400,       78,       72,     
13137,        0
tcpreass:                  20,      676,        0,      169,     
48826,        0
sackhole:                  20,        0,        0,      169,       
194,        0
ripcb:                    180,     8778,        4,       40,    
142316,        0
unpcb:                    144,     8775,       19,       62,    
393432,        0
rtentry:                  132,        0,      480,      187,    
448160,        0
pfsrctrpl:                100,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfrulepl:                 604,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfstatepl:                260,    10005,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfaltqpl:                 128,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfpooladdrpl:              68,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfrktable:               1240,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfrkentry:                156,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfrkentry2:               156,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pffrent:                   16,     5075,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pffrag:                    48,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pffrcache:                 48,    10062,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pffrcent:                  12,    50141,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfstatescrub:              28,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfiaddrpl:                 92,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfospfen:                 108,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
pfosfp:                    28,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
IPFW dynamic rule zone:      108,        0,      147,      393,  
20301589,        0
divcb:                    180,     8778,        2,       42,        
45,        0
SWAPMETA:                 276,    30548,     2257,      473,    
348836,        0
Mountpoints:              664,        0,        8,       10,       
100,        0
FFS inode:                132,        0,     2000,     6468,  
40152792,        0
FFS1 dinode:              128,        0,        0,        0,         
0,        0
FFS2 dinode:              256,        0,     2000,     3730,  
40152792,        0


-- 
WBR, Vadim Goncharov
_______________________________________________
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Fri Jan 4, 4:42 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Brooks Davis, (Fri Jan 4, 9:33 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Fri Jan 4, 10:58 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Brooks Davis, (Fri Jan 4, 11:12 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Peter Schuller, (Sun Jan 6, 2:51 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 5:58 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 6:07 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Maciej Suszko, (Sun Jan 6, 6:46 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 6:50 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 7:27 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 7:51 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 8:08 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Sun Jan 6, 8:36 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 8:46 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Henri Hennebert, (Sun Jan 6, 8:48 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 9:03 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Maciej Suszko, (Sun Jan 6, 9:05 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 9:22 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 9:45 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Henri Hennebert, (Sun Jan 6, 9:47 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 9:47 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Sun Jan 6, 10:08 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 10:12 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 10:13 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 10:20 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 10:20 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 10:28 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 10:34 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 10:36 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 10:43 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 11:00 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 11:09 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 11:10 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Gary Corcoran, (Sun Jan 6, 11:48 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 11:49 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Maciej Suszko, (Sun Jan 6, 12:56 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Claus Guttesen, (Sun Jan 6, 1:00 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Vadim Goncharov, (Sun Jan 6, 1:56 pm)
ZFS honesty, Scott Long, (Sun Jan 6, 2:00 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 2:32 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Kris Kennaway, (Sun Jan 6, 2:42 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Scott Long, (Sun Jan 6, 2:54 pm)
Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Maxim Sobolev, (Sun Jan 6, 2:56 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Sun Jan 6, 3:20 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Sun Jan 6, 3:32 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 3:33 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Sun Jan 6, 3:33 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 3:43 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 3:45 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Sun Jan 6, 3:58 pm)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Adam McDougall, (Sun Jan 6, 4:32 pm)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Erich Dollansky, (Sun Jan 6, 4:39 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Alexandre "Sunny" Ko ..., (Sun Jan 6, 5:03 pm)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Maxim Sobolev, (Sun Jan 6, 5:58 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Ivan Voras, (Sun Jan 6, 6:16 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, 韓家標 Bill Hacker, (Sun Jan 6, 7:29 pm)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Christian Walther, (Mon Jan 7, 12:10 am)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Igor Mozolevsky, (Mon Jan 7, 1:20 am)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Christian Walther, (Mon Jan 7, 1:51 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Pawel Jakub Dawidek, (Mon Jan 7, 2:59 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Mon Jan 7, 3:30 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Igor Mozolevsky, (Mon Jan 7, 6:17 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, (Mon Jan 7, 7:04 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Mon Jan 7, 7:37 am)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Joao Barros, (Mon Jan 7, 7:52 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Vadim Goncharov, (Mon Jan 7, 8:16 am)
Re: ZFS honesty, Alexandre Biancalana, (Mon Jan 7, 8:23 am)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Bernd Walter, (Mon Jan 7, 8:36 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Mon Jan 7, 8:39 am)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Peter Schuller, (Mon Jan 7, 10:06 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Andrew Thompson, (Mon Jan 7, 1:46 pm)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Alexander Kabaev, (Mon Jan 7, 3:47 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Vadim Goncharov, (Mon Jan 7, 4:28 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Mon Jan 7, 4:39 pm)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, David Taylor, (Tue Jan 8, 12:56 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Tue Jan 8, 2:19 am)
Re: Should we simply disallow ZFS on FreeBSD/i386?, Oliver Fromme, (Tue Jan 8, 10:51 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Oliver Fromme, (Tue Jan 8, 10:58 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Steve Kargl, (Tue Jan 8, 10:59 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Dag-Erling Smørgrav, (Tue Jan 8, 11:24 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Vadim Goncharov, (Tue Jan 8, 11:58 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Robert Watson, (Tue Jan 8, 12:22 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Ivan Voras, (Tue Jan 8, 4:16 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Dan Nelson, (Tue Jan 8, 10:45 pm)
Re: ZFS honesty, Andrew Gallatin, (Wed Jan 9, 6:23 am)
Re: ZFS honesty, Alexandre "Sunny" Ko ..., (Wed Jan 9, 7:55 am)
Re: ZFS honesty, Andrew Gallatin, (Wed Jan 9, 8:36 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Scot Hetzel, (Wed Jan 9, 10:39 am)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Mark Powell, (Sat Jan 12, 2:45 pm)
Re: When will ZFS become stable?, Darren Reed, (Tue Jan 22, 8:09 am)