Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Willem Jan Withagen
Date: Thursday, November 13, 2008 - 1:32 am

Danny Carroll wrote:

Just as a polite question, since I'm very much in favor doing benchmarking and 
do appreciate these kinds of test.

You might want to add an introductory page to your results describing how you 
setup the test:
	Details of the hardware
	Details of the disk setup
	possible version and options with bonnie
	The script you used....

This would allow others to redo your experiment and try to figure out why their 
numbers are different.

--WjW

_______________________________________________
freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Thu Oct 30, 8:32 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:07 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Thu Oct 30, 9:34 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Andrew Snow, (Thu Oct 30, 9:44 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:47 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:50 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Oct 30, 9:55 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Peter Schuller, (Sun Nov 2, 8:09 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing. , Dieter, (Wed Nov 12, 3:57 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Wed Nov 12, 10:46 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Thu Nov 13, 12:43 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Willem Jan Withagen, (Thu Nov 13, 1:32 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 4:09 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 6:59 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Nikolay Denev, (Thu Nov 13, 8:06 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Scott Long, (Thu Nov 13, 9:49 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 1:46 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Nov 13, 1:59 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Eirik Øverby, (Sun Nov 16, 1:27 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Sun Nov 16, 8:15 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Matt Simerson, (Sun Nov 16, 11:06 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jeremy Chadwick, (Mon Nov 17, 12:08 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Wes Morgan, (Mon Nov 17, 4:26 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Mon Nov 17, 4:43 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Matt Simerson, (Mon Nov 17, 2:04 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Matt Simerson, (Mon Nov 17, 3:07 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Mon Nov 17, 4:46 pm)
RE: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Jan Mikkelsen, (Tue Dec 2, 3:38 am)
RE: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Wes Morgan, (Tue Dec 2, 5:04 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Wed Jan 7, 5:33 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Zaphod Beeblebrox, (Thu Jan 8, 12:40 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Thu Jan 8, 12:48 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Nikolay Denev, (Thu Jan 8, 2:19 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Thu Jan 8, 7:30 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Fri Jan 9, 1:46 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Fri Jan 9, 2:02 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Koen Smits, (Fri Jan 9, 8:58 am)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Andrew Snow, (Fri Jan 9, 7:38 pm)
Re: Areca vs. ZFS performance testing., Danny Carroll, (Fri Jan 9, 9:58 pm)