On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 10:01:33AM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 19 Oct 2006 10:58:48 -0400, Aaron Bentley wrote:
> > On the other hand, I think your revision identifiers are not as
> > permanent as you think.
> >
> > In the first place, it seems fairly common in the Git community to
> > rebase.  This process throws away old revisions and creates new
> > revisions that are morally equivalent[1].
> 
> Yes, rebasing does "destroy history" in one sense, (in actual fact, it
> creates new commits and leaves the old ones around, which may or may
> not have references to them anymore).

Note that the id's are still permanent in this case; they will never
(module some assumptions about the crypto) be reused.  So a given id
points at one and only one object, for all time; it's just that we may
forget what that one object is....

quoted text
> > In the second place, one must consider the "nuclear launch codes"
> > scenario.
> 
> Sure. And git does provide tools that can do this.

So in this case you can certainly lose the launch codes.  But you have
forever granted everyone a way to determine whether a given guess at the
launch codes is correct.  (Again, assuming some stuff about SHA1).

--b.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html