Marco Costalba, Sat, Dec 09, 2006 16:16:32 +0100:Strictly speaking: you can't. Anything you'd try will either be not portable or involve quiet complex dependencies (like perl). Are you sure you can't control each process independently? Speaking not so strictly, you can use a script engine which supports either signal handling or exit notification (i.e. sh has traps and perl has %SIG and END{}). It's unsafe, ugly and not quiet portable to that other operating system, but it often works and is (ab)used. Which is "fancy" enough. What do you mean "start"? Starting a new process usually and notably involves forking and execing (even if the first thing to exec will be your shell). - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer | [PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree |
| Alexander Sulfrian | [RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set |
