On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted text
> 
> If somebody has time and inclination, please try updated PPC SHA-1
> from linux@horizon.com that is in "pu" (say make check-sha1) and
> report impressions.

"make check-sha1" passes.

Before:
	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time git-fsck-objects --full
	101.90user 4.66system 1:46.72elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+1787158minor)pagefaults 0swaps

After:
	[torvalds@g5 linux]$ /usr/bin/time ~/git/git-fsck-objects --full
	101.16user 4.32system 1:45.56elapsed 99%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
	0inputs+0outputs (0major+1787127minor)pagefaults 0swaps

which doesn't seem to really imply anything seriously changed (in fact, 
rerunning it made the numbers even closer).

This is on a G5 powerpc.

Also, "pu" in general is totally unusable. It doesn't even compile.

I think that "Git.xs" thing is fine for random hacks, but please please 
PLEASE don't make any central program depend on it.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html