Re: [PATCH] don't mention index refreshing side effect in git-status docs

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jonathan del Strother
Date: Sunday, December 9, 2007 - 9:16 am

On Dec 9, 2007 8:21 AM, Jeff King <peff@peff.net> wrote:


...   I wasn't aware the index needed refreshing.  This might be
totally unrelated to the present conversation, but the GIT-VERSION-GEN
script occasionally gives me spurious 'dirty' results (eg when a file
timestamp changes despite the content having changed).  Should it
perhaps be running "git update-index --refresh" before it runs "git
diff-index --name-only HEAD" ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] don't mention index refreshing side effect in ..., Jonathan del Strother, (Sun Dec 9, 9:16 am)