Michael Haggerty <mhagger@alum.mit.edu>:I found my copy of the bug report, and I misremembered the problem slightly. It turns out to be even more relevant to this discussion than I thought. Thread begins with <20040810031409.GA25564@thyrsus.com> on 9 Aug 2004. The thread title was "RFC -- enhancing cvs2svn to have a notion of spans of mergeable commits". Your mailing-list archive search can't seem to find it, unfortunately. I'll repost the query iseparately OK. But I think that if SVN -> X is hard, CVS -> X is going to be harder. Not quite. I'm suggesting it's an appropriate lingua franca for centralized VCSes with branching, e.g. everything pre-Arch. Then perhaps the right thing to think about is this: how exactly does CVS history need to be deformed, and is there some way to express the lost information as conventional properties or tags? Well, that makes more sense. But how would whatever the first half outputs be different from an svn dump file? -- <a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer |
