Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
quoted text
> I do not think Eric is right here.  You will allways lose information 
> when converting CVS to svn, and if it is just the uncertainty, the 
> non-atomicity.  This is also information (hidden one, though).

Full ACK.

quoted text
> Yes.  I've already done what people want, it is not called cvs2xxx, but 
> fromcvs [1].  I don't think it is necessary to define an output format.  
> Of course, that's possible, but limiting yourself to a file format means 
> you're losing flexibility, which is needed for efficient, correct and 
> fast repository conversion.

Hm.. interesting. I'll have a close look.

Regards

Markus

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html