Hi, On Thu, 2 Oct 2008, martin f krafft wrote:It _is_ academic. Did you already discuss the chance that your wife gives birth to a mouse? I haven't done the maths yet, but I am pretty certain that this would be more likely than an unintended SHA-1 collision. Basically, the commit that David has will not be overwritten. So every commit referring to Jane's commit would point to David's in his repository. But the more likely case (well, as likely goes) would be that either Jane's or David's object is actually a blob. And Git would complain about a type mismatch then. Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | Og dreams of kernels |
| Jens Axboe | [PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support |
| Arnd Bergmann | Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables |
| Mark Brown | [PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset |
| Tony Breeds | [LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config |
git: | |
| Brian Downing | Re: Git in a Nutshell guide |
| John Benes | Re: master has some toys |
| Matthias Lederhofer | [PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree |
| Alexander Sulfrian |
