Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Junio C Hamano
Date: Sunday, April 27, 2008 - 10:31 am

Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:


Care to elaborate on this point further?  I do not get it.

Do you mean to say "I hate it because it does things differently from how
I did it originally", or "Because it does things differently from how the
original did, it breaks this and that cases"?

If the latter, "this and that" part is especially useful.  A solution to
fix that may end up to be closer to the original implementation.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Junio C Hamano, (Sun Apr 27, 10:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 3:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 11:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 2:30 pm)