Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeff King
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008 - 4:23 am

On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 07:20:30AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:


Also, if there is interest in an automated "this is now broken on
platform X", I think the interesting thing is not "what was the last
passing state" but rather "what is the output of 'make test' for the
failing state." So:


In that case, I think the interesting automation is making a problem
report from a failed case.

-Peff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 3:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 11:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 2:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Jeff King, (Thu May 15, 4:23 am)