Home » Mailing list archives » git » 2008 » May » 15

Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Junio C Hamano
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use whitespace.
Date: Thursday, May 15, 2008 - 10:18 am

Jeff King <peff@peff.net> writes:


I'd prefer heterogeneous automated test coverage to be on 'next' and
'master'.  If the coverage extends to 'maint' that would be nicer, but on
the other hand, I rarely apply anything remotely questionable directly on
top of maint (instead, I'd fork from maint and merge the result first to
next or master), so if we can catch master and next, we should be Ok.

Before any push-out, I ran tests on all four integration branches on
Debian (etch) and FC (I think it is FC5), both x86-64.  But sometimes 'pu'
is shipped with known breakage in tests.  I can not push out with broken
tests in 'maint', 'master' or 'next' (automated procedure on my end
prevents me from doing so).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not use ..., Brian Gernhardt, (Sun Apr 27, 8:16 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Sun Apr 27, 8:22 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Brian Gernhardt, (Sun Apr 27, 8:32 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Junio C Hamano, (Sun Apr 27, 10:31 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Jeff King, (Mon Apr 28, 2:41 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Mike Ralphson, (Mon Apr 28, 2:56 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 3:13 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Brian Gernhardt, (Mon Apr 28, 5:40 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Junio C Hamano, (Mon Apr 28, 9:19 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 11:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Junio C Hamano, (Mon Apr 28, 2:24 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Johannes Schindelin, (Mon Apr 28, 2:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Jeff King, (Tue May 13, 2:11 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Mike Ralphson, (Tue May 13, 11:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Mike Ralphson, (Thu May 15, 3:16 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Jeff King, (Thu May 15, 4:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Jeff King, (Thu May 15, 4:23 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Junio C Hamano, (Thu May 15, 10:18 am)
Re: [PATCH 2/2] Fix t3404 assumption that `wc -l` does not ..., Mike Ralphson, (Fri May 16, 7:22 am)