Aha, thanks for the pointer. I'm not sure I'm in a position to
restart that discussion, but let's try anyway:
Note that what Junio said in
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/67854/focus=68108
is precisely what my patch implements. I did not implement the
stashing he recommends in the same message, but I believe the fact
that 'add -p' stages the end result should be enough (and works at
least for my use case).
Johannes Sixt replied:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/67854/focus=68108
I didn't do this because there is no way to ensure that the "other
half" can be applied cleanly to the unpatched state, thus requiring
extra tracking of "hunk dependencies", so to speak. It could be done
of course, if anyone really needs it.
You also mention
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/67854/focus=68108
The y/n loop with count prefix works well for me. It would be nice to
have it in an actual GUI of course, but I don't know enough Tcl/Tk to
implement that.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Rast
trast@student.ethz.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html