Re: "git pull . <branch>" versus "git merge <branch>"

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 - 7:04 pm

Miklos Vajna wrote:

However, when you're on a tracking merge only "git pull" will merge the 
right branch automatically into the current branch, fetching the branch 
name to merge from the config.  If the branch.*.remote config key is 
".", it will do a local merge.

Note that "git pull ." is optimized in that the fetch does nothing 
except setting up MERGE_HEAD.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: "git pull . <branch>" versus "git merge <branch>", Paolo Bonzini, (Tue Jun 10, 7:04 pm)