2008/7/8 Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>:
quoted text
> On 2008-07-07 21:54:01 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>
>> 2008/7/4 Karl Hasselström <kha@treskal.com>:
>>
>> > In this one, I've just removed the --undo flag from sync without
>> > adding anything back. Still undetermined if that's OK.
>>
>> I think it should be ok (see the other thread). Anyway, have you
>> heard of anyone else using sync apart from me?
>
> No, I haven't.
>
> I've tried to understand what it does, and as far as I can tell it
> doesn't do quite what I want. (What I want is the ability to 3-way
> merge StGit patch stacks, so that I can modify the same patch stack in
> several places and merge back and forth. From what I recall, the sync
> command is more like a 2-way merge -- that is, it doesn't take the
> last common ancestor into account. But it's been a while since I
> studied it.)

No, the sync command is a 3-way merge between the top of a remote
patch, the top of the current patch (current HEAD actually) and the
bottom of the remote patch as ancestor. It also has a mode to
synchronise with a patch file and it applies the patch onto the bottom
of the current patch and does the merging between patch tops
afterwards.

This is not ideal as I have to deal with safe conflicts several time
(maybe adding git-rerere support would help). If you have better ideas
for keeping two stacks in sync, I'm happy to accept them (or maybe
just a different workflow).

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html