Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Paolo Bonzini
Date: Saturday, August 23, 2008 - 2:24 am

Andi Kleen wrote:

I think if you have to rebase often, you're actually better off using
stgit (patch queues is what the mercurial folks use instead of
often-rebased local branches).

Disclaimer: I am not an stgit user myself.

Paolo

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 22, 10:46 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 22, 10:55 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Avery Pennarun, (Fri Aug 22, 10:56 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 22, 11:27 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 22, 11:31 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Ciarrocchi, (Fri Aug 22, 12:03 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Jakub Narebski, (Fri Aug 22, 12:34 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 22, 12:36 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Mikael Magnusson, (Fri Aug 22, 1:11 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Ciarrocchi, (Fri Aug 22, 1:11 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 22, 1:29 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Fri Aug 22, 1:33 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Björn, (Fri Aug 22, 1:36 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Ciarrocchi, (Fri Aug 22, 1:46 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Junio C Hamano, (Fri Aug 22, 2:23 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Sat Aug 23, 12:10 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Sat Aug 23, 12:15 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Jakub Narebski, (Sat Aug 23, 2:21 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Bonzini, (Sat Aug 23, 2:24 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 23, 8:55 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Sat Aug 23, 9:36 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Sat Aug 23, 9:45 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Andi Kleen, (Sat Aug 23, 9:53 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 23, 10:58 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Björn, (Sat Aug 23, 11:18 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 23, 11:56 am)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Björn, (Sat Aug 23, 1:08 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Ciarrocchi, (Sat Aug 23, 2:04 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 23, 2:52 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Ciarrocchi, (Sat Aug 23, 3:09 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Björn, (Sat Aug 23, 3:13 pm)
Re: Documentating branches, Marius Vollmer, (Sat Aug 23, 3:18 pm)
Re: Documenting branches, Marius Vollmer, (Sat Aug 23, 3:30 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Jakub Narebski, (Sat Aug 23, 3:49 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Paolo Bonzini, (Sat Aug 23, 4:00 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Theodore Tso, (Sat Aug 23, 4:01 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Junio C Hamano, (Sat Aug 23, 5:30 pm)
Re: nicer frontend to get rebased tree?, Ingo Molnar, (Mon Aug 25, 2:36 am)