On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Michael J Gruber
<git@drmicha.warpmail.net> wrote:
quoted text
>
> Not yet another one, please!
>
> I'm sorry, but that was my first thought. I lost count of how many
> half-finished GUIs we have, using tcl/tk, gtk, qt, you-name-it-tk. I
> still don't see any which provide a consistent, "modern", stable GUI for
> viewing *and* committing, i.e. a replacement for gitk and git-gui.
>
> The latter two still seem to be the most feature rich choices, but they
> suffer somewhat from their implementation language. Just look at the git
> survey and you know why nobody wants to work on them.

For what it's worth, GitX (OS X only) does both history viewing and
committing, and seems to be rapidly approaching the feature set of
gitk and git-gui combined. Unfortunately, I seem to inevitably hate
cross-platform GUI's---they never feel right or work slickly enough.
Sad, but true.

If GitX and this newer project could share a lot of code base, then
maybe their co-development would be accelerated and both would end up
being slick, native, full-fledged GUIs for git.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html