Re: ls & flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Brian Sullivan
Date: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 - 1:27 pm

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> wrote:

Yes, no change with patch.

-Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Brian Sullivan, (Wed Nov 17, 10:03 pm)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Chris Ball, (Wed Nov 17, 10:15 pm)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Brian Sullivan, (Wed Nov 17, 11:03 pm)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Daniel J Blueman, (Thu Nov 18, 4:08 am)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Brian Sullivan, (Thu Nov 18, 11:30 am)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Chris Mason, (Fri Nov 19, 7:32 am)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Josef Bacik, (Fri Nov 19, 7:46 am)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Brian Sullivan, (Fri Nov 19, 1:09 pm)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Brian Sullivan, (Mon Nov 22, 4:29 pm)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Chris Mason, (Mon Nov 22, 5:54 pm)
Re: ls & flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Brian Sullivan, (Tue Nov 23, 1:27 pm)
Re: ls &amp; flush-btrfs-1 sit at 100% sys, Chris Mason, (Tue Nov 23, 2:07 pm)