maximilian attems wrote:Yes, it would be cool :) Five years is a long time to maintain something out of tree, especially recently when there's been so many minor changes to the VFS interface between kernel releases. I don't know of any major distro that doesn't ship Squashfs either (except arguably Slackware). Putting my other hat on (one of the Ubuntu kernel maintainers) I don't think Squashfs has caused distros that many problems because it is an easy patch to apply (it doesn't touch that many kernel files), but it is always good to minimise the differences from the stock kernel.org kernel. Phillip - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Daniel Eischen | Re: error with thread |
