Re: fixed memory bytes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mulyadi Santosa
Date: Tuesday, January 4, 2011 - 10:58 am

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 00:40, mohit verma <mohit89mlnc@gmail.com> wrote:

Your question isn't specific enough, so I'll just guess. Let's say
"int". In 32 bit, AFAIK it's  4 byte, but in 64 bit (like IA 64, not
sure if it's x64) it's 8 byte. So, if you just say "int", you will
likely getting screwed up.

By using types like u_int or something like that, you pretty much say
"I mean 4 byte kind of integer" etc

-- 
regards,

Mulyadi Santosa
Freelance Linux trainer and consultant

blog: the-hydra.blogspot.com
training: mulyaditraining.blogspot.com

_______________________________________________
Kernelnewbies mailing list
Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org
http://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
fixed memory bytes, mohit verma, (Tue Jan 4, 10:40 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Mulyadi Santosa, (Tue Jan 4, 10:58 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Rajesh S R, (Tue Jan 4, 11:07 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, mohit verma, (Tue Jan 4, 11:22 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, John Mahoney, (Tue Jan 4, 11:24 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Mulyadi Santosa, (Tue Jan 4, 11:25 am)
Re: fixed memory bytes, Denis Kirjanov, (Tue Jan 4, 12:17 pm)
Re: fixed memory bytes, John Mahoney, (Tue Jan 4, 2:15 pm)
Re: fixed memory bytes, sk.syed2, (Tue Jan 4, 3:20 pm)
Re: fixed memory bytes, julie Sullivan, (Tue Jan 4, 3:59 pm)