Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mark Lord
Date: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 8:38 am

Douglas Gilbert wrote:

That'll be useful in a couple of years, once drives that have it
become more common.  For now, though, we're hacking current drives
using READ/WRITE LONG commands, with a corresponding patch to libata
to allow for the longer "sector size" involved.

Having real bad sectors, exactly where we want them on the media,
sure does make testing / fixing the EH mechanisms a lot more feasible.

Cheers

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Tue Jan 30, 6:41 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Ric Wheeler, (Tue Jan 30, 8:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, James Bottomley, (Tue Jan 30, 9:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Douglas Gilbert, (Tue Jan 30, 10:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Jeff Garzik, (Wed Jan 31, 2:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Ric Wheeler, (Wed Jan 31, 7:36 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Wed Jan 31, 8:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Wed Jan 31, 8:13 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Wed Jan 31, 8:22 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, James Bottomley, (Wed Jan 31, 8:24 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Douglas Gilbert, (Wed Jan 31, 8:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Wed Jan 31, 8:38 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Ric Wheeler, (Wed Jan 31, 9:35 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Wed Jan 31, 10:57 am)