Re: [PATCH] [24/45] x86: Introduce frame_pointer() and stack_pointer()

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Monday, October 1, 2007 - 9:48 am

On Saturday 22 September 2007 11:26:14 Christoph Hellwig wrote:

I'll leave that to the architecture maintainers. Besides many probably
don't have a frame pointer.

-Andi



-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] [0/45] x86 2.6.24 patches review I, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [1/45] x86: misc. constifications, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [2/45] x86: constify stacktrace_ops, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [4/45] i386: Rewrite sched_clock, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:44 pm)
[PATCH] [25/45] x86_64: remove sync_Arb_IDs, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [31/45] i386: make struct apic_probe static, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [33/45] i386: es7000 minor cleanups, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [35/45] i386: make some variables static, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
[PATCH] [41/45] i386: remove unnecessary code, Andi Kleen, (Fri Sep 21, 1:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] [24/45] x86: Introduce frame_pointer() and sta ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Sep 22, 2:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] [32/45] x86_64: hide cond_syscall behind __KER ..., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Sep 22, 2:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] [24/45] x86: Introduce frame_pointer() and sta ..., Andi Kleen, (Mon Oct 1, 9:48 am)