Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Tuesday, October 23, 2007 - 6:07 pm

From: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 21:03:36 -0400


The first idea I get is:

1) Create netdev->validate_dev_addr().

2) If it exists, invoke it before ->open(), abort
   and return if any errors signaled.

etherdev init hooks up a function that does the above
check, which allows us to avoid editing every ethernet
driver

What do you think?
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Add eeprom_bad_csum_allow module option to e1000., Stephen Hemminger, (Tue Oct 23, 4:53 pm)
[PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Oct 23, 5:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Oct 23, 6:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, David Miller, (Tue Oct 23, 6:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Oct 23, 6:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Jeff Garzik, (Tue Oct 23, 7:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, David Miller, (Tue Oct 23, 7:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Kok, Auke, (Thu Nov 1, 11:04 am)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Nov 1, 11:11 am)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Jeff Garzik, (Thu Nov 1, 11:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] e1000, e1000e valid-addr fixes, Jeff Garzik, (Thu Nov 1, 12:31 pm)