On Wed, 3 Oct 2007 03:45:09 +1000 Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

quoted text
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-2.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-function-declaration.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-fix-bug-at-include-linux-mmh220.p
> >atch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-kill-redundancy-in-rotate_reclaim
> >able_page.patch
> > mm-use-pagevec-to-rotate-reclaimable-page-move_tail_pages-into-lru_add_drai
> >n.patch
> >
> >   I guess I'll merge this.  Would be nice to have wider perfromance testing
> >   but I guess it'll be easy enough to undo.
> 
> Care to give it one more round through -mm? Is it easy enough to
> keep?

Yup.  Nobody has done much with that code in ages.

quoted text
> I haven't had a chance to review it, which I'd like to do at some
> point (and I don't think it would hurt to have a bit more testing).

Sure.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/