On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:58:26PM +0200, Dmitry Adamushko wrote:
quoted text
> On 03/10/2007, Dmitry Adamushko <dmitry.adamushko@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 03/10/2007, Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl> wrote:
> > > I can't see anything about clearing. I think, this was about charging,
> > > which should change the key enough, to move a task to, maybe, a better
> > > place in a que (tree) than with current ways.
> >
> > just a quick patch, not tested and I've not evaluated all possible
> > implications yet.
> > But someone might give it a try with his/(her -- are even more
> > welcomed :-) favourite sched_yield() load.
> >
> > (and white space damaged)
> >
> > --- sched_fair-old.c    2007-10-03 12:45:17.010306000 +0200
> > +++ sched_fair.c        2007-10-03 12:44:46.899851000 +0200
...
quoted text
> s/curr/se

Thanks very much!

Alas, I'll be able to look at this and try only in the evening.

Best regards,
Jarek P.
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/