* Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@o2.pl> wrote:
quoted text > > [...] The timeslices of tasks (i.e. the time they spend on a CPU
> > without scheduling away) is _not_ maintained directly in CFS as a
> > per-task variable that can be "cleared", it's not the metric that
> > drives scheduling. Yes, of course CFS too "slices up CPU time", but
> > those slices are not the per-task variables of traditional
> > schedulers and cannot be 'cleared'.
>
> It's not about this comment alone, but this comment plus "no notion"
> comment, which appears in sched-design-CFS.txt too.
ok - i've re-read it and it indeed is somewhat confusing without
additional context. I'll improve the wording. (sched-design-CFS.txt
needs an update anyway)
Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: yield , Jarek Poplawski , (Wed Oct 3, 5:16 am)
Re: Network slowdown due to CFS , Ingo Molnar , (Sun Oct 7, 12:18 am)