I disagree that this is a regression. You can still bounce between archs
as before, but the fact is that these are not separate archs anymore. The
sooner we'll get used to the fact the better.
You also don't bounce between archs just by changing ARCH, you also have
to reconfigure the kernel and that's there you can change the 64bit
option. This means for the normal user not much is changing and from an
experienced user I'd expect to know the difference.
If we look at this as a new feature, we have to look at what is needed to
support this properly. Should the arch name imply certain config options?
This wouldn't have to be limited to 64BIT - SMP or MMU could be other
options. I think it would also make sense to hide the corresponding config
option, otherwise one could change an option, which is a little later
ignored anyway. Another question would be if and how it affects other
information like uname information.
What I'd like to avoid is to add potential cruft, which is only used to
avoid the inevitable to properly learn how to configure the kernel. A user
interface has a lot to do with logic, especially consistency - an
inconsistent mess also doesn't taste very good.
bye, Roman
-