On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 09:12:25PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
What makes you say this? I don't see any need for interrupts prior to
calibrate_delay()
I understand the sentiment here, but its not like we're adding additional
functionality with this patch. We're already sending an IPI to all the
processors to halt them, we're just adding logic here so that we can detect the
boot cpu and use it to jump to the kexec image instead of halting. I don't
think this is any less reliable that what we have currently.
Regards
Neil
--
/***************************************************
*Neil Horman
*Software Engineer
*Red Hat, Inc.
*nhorman@redhat.com
*gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1
*http://pgp.mit.edu
***************************************************/
-