Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
quoted text > That happens to me when interfaces are described in SELinux terms. I
> still don't care much for multiple contexts, and I don't have a good
> grasp of how you'll deal with Smack, or any LSM other than SELinux.
Me neither. I understand SELinux somewhat, though it's got a lot of wibbly
bits, and WinNT's security system, but I have no experience of the other
stuff.
quoted text > Just as Stephen mentions, I also don't see the generality that a change
> of this magnitude really ought to provide.
Perhaps it should be a specific interface, solely for cachefiles's use then.
David
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 08/28] SECURITY: Allow kernel services to overr ... , David Howells , (Mon Dec 10, 4:44 pm)