Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Mark Lord
Date: Friday, February 2, 2007 - 3:58 pm

Matt Mackall wrote:

All good input.  But what was being debated here is not so much
the retrying of known-bad sectors, but rather what to do about
the kiBs or MiBs of sectors remaining in a merged request after
hitting a single bad sector mid-way.

Currently, SCSI just abandons the entire remaining workload.

Cheers
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Tue Jan 30, 5:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, James Bottomley, (Tue Jan 30, 6:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Mark Lord, (Tue Jan 30, 6:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, James Bottomley, (Thu Feb 1, 2:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Ric Wheeler, (Fri Feb 2, 5:20 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, James Bottomley, (Fri Feb 2, 7:53 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Ric Wheeler, (Fri Feb 2, 9:16 am)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Matt Mackall, (Fri Feb 2, 12:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR, Douglas Gilbert, (Fri Feb 2, 1:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] scsi_lib.c: continue after MEDIUM_ERROR