Re: dirty balancing deadlock

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Mason
Date: Monday, February 19, 2007 - 5:13 pm

On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 06:11:55PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:

Ok, what is supposed to happen here is that filesystems are supposed to
be throttled from making more dirty pages when the system is over the
threshold.  Even if filesystem A doesn't have much to contribute, and
filesystem B is the cause of 99% of the dirty pages, the goal of the
threshold is to prevent more dirty data from happening, and filesystem A
should block.

But, with the producer consumer setup of fuse, I think this is a pretty
good compromise.  16 dirty/writeback pages shouldn't hurt the overall
limits too badly.

-chris

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 11:28 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Andrew Morton, (Sun Feb 18, 1:53 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Rik van Riel, (Sun Feb 18, 2:25 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 3:50 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 3:54 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Andrew Morton, (Sun Feb 18, 3:59 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 4:22 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Andrew Morton, (Sun Feb 18, 4:59 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 5:25 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 5:30 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 5:45 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Chris Mason, (Sun Feb 18, 5:45 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 5:54 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Chris Mason, (Sun Feb 18, 6:01 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Sun Feb 18, 6:14 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon Feb 19, 10:11 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Mon Feb 19, 4:12 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Chris Mason, (Mon Feb 19, 5:13 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Chris Mason, (Mon Feb 19, 5:16 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Tue Feb 20, 1:47 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Tue Feb 20, 1:53 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Chris Mason, (Tue Feb 20, 4:30 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 21, 2:36 pm)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Feb 22, 12:42 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Andrew Morton, (Thu Feb 22, 12:55 am)
Re: dirty balancing deadlock, Miklos Szeredi, (Thu Feb 22, 1:02 am)