Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Christoph Lameter
Date: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 8:25 am

On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:


This is a trylock. If it fails then we can compensate by allocating
a new slab.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Feb 22, 12:00 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Feb 22, 1:34 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, David Miller, (Thu Feb 22, 1:58 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Pekka Enberg, (Thu Feb 22, 3:49 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Feb 22, 8:15 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Feb 22, 8:25 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Feb 22, 8:26 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Andi Kleen, (Thu Feb 22, 10:54 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Feb 22, 11:42 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Andi Kleen, (Thu Feb 22, 5:16 pm)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Thu Feb 22, 9:55 pm)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Fri Feb 23, 10:28 pm)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Feb 23, 10:47 pm)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, David Miller, (Fri Feb 23, 10:54 pm)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Sat Feb 24, 10:32 am)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Jörn, (Sat Feb 24, 12:33 pm)
Re: SLUB: The unqueued Slab allocator, Christoph Lameter, (Sat Feb 24, 5:14 pm)