Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: James Bottomley
Date: Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 3:06 pm

On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 16:02 -0600, Mike Miller (OS Dev) wrote:

Yes, I think that should be fine ... it's only a theoretical worry; at
the moment sector_t is unsigned ... but just in case.

James


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Mike Miller (OS Dev), (Wed Feb 21, 2:10 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Andrew Morton, (Wed Feb 21, 8:14 pm)
[PATCH] Speedup divides by cpu_power in scheduler, Eric Dumazet, (Thu Feb 22, 12:31 am)
Re: [PATCH] Speedup divides by cpu_power in scheduler, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Feb 22, 12:56 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Mike Miller (OS Dev), (Thu Feb 22, 9:51 am)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Mike Miller (OS Dev), (Thu Feb 22, 1:18 pm)
RE: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Miller, Mike (OS Dev), (Thu Feb 22, 2:22 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Andrew Morton, (Thu Feb 22, 2:24 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, James Bottomley, (Thu Feb 22, 2:41 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Mike Miller (OS Dev), (Thu Feb 22, 3:02 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, James Bottomley, (Thu Feb 22, 3:06 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Mike Miller (OS Dev), (Fri Feb 23, 1:52 pm)
Re: [Patch 1/2] cciss: fix for 2TB support, Andrew Morton, (Fri Feb 23, 11:35 pm)