Allow me to point out that the original patch is Oliver's (although I
helped), and it doesn't need to go in -- it needs not to be removed.
Furthermore, I have better things to do with the next month of my time
than auditing hundreds of routines I don't understand for behavior I
probably won't be able to recognize. (Although at 50 a day... hmmm,
This sounds more like a job for kernel-janitors!
On Tue, 13 Mar 2007, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Very good points. USB doesn't do anything like that either. And right,
it's okay for a method to destroy other devices; it just can't do anything
that would lead to its own unregistration.