Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Friday, March 16, 2007 - 2:14 am

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:



i'd suggest to remove the #ifdef and push it into xen-head.S.


why is this done?


does the native kernel lose memory here?


this is a cleanup unrelated to the purpose of the patch.


change this to tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick()/restart_sched_tick() instead.


hm?


80+ chars line. (there are more instances of this throughout the patch)


coding style.


comment coding style. (there are instances of this throughout the patch)


missing whitespace.


80+ chars.


hm?


unnecessary newline.


nicely done! :-)


hm?


hm?


hm?


make it noret.


ditto.



NACK for now, for the reasons outlined in the 'stolen time' thread. 
Stolen time accounting is a concept only related to the scheduler tick, 
it's not a concept that should leak into normal timer interrupt 
concepts.


that should be updated to clockevents. (i suspect it already is?)


hm?

	Ingo
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Mar 1, 4:25 pm)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Mar 16, 2:14 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Mar 16, 5:00 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 16, 9:44 am)
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core X ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Mar 18, 12:03 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Mar 19, 11:05 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Mar 19, 11:13 am)