Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Chris Wright
Date: Friday, March 16, 2007 - 9:33 am

* Ingo Molnar (mingo@elte.hu) wrote:

That's been fixed, the two are built as seperate objects now.


Sure, will split out.


I don't think we want to do that.  It's dropped now with proper NO_HZ
support, as the core does that for us.


That's already been fixed.


cleaning those


dropped


that's already been fixed

that's already been fixed


that's already been fixed


It's actually used now, so it's not noret-able (if that's a word ;-)

ditto


As Jeremey mentioned in that thread, it's just used as a place
to tigger the caluculations periodically.


Yes it is.


Good point, I don't recall the condition where that would get
triggered.

thanks,
-chris
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Mar 1, 4:25 pm)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Christoph Hellwig, (Fri Mar 16, 5:00 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Chris Wright, (Fri Mar 16, 9:33 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Fri Mar 16, 9:44 am)
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core X ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Sun Mar 18, 12:03 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Mar 19, 11:05 am)
Re: [patch 20/26] Xen-paravirt_ops: Core Xen implementation, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Mar 19, 11:13 am)