Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20)

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Alan Cox
Date: Saturday, March 24, 2007 - 11:43 am

On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 12:38:02 -0400 (EDT)
Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> wrote:


It depends on the drive. Generally NCQ is better but some drive firmware
isn't too bright and there are probably still cases where we get bad
interactions in the kernel code that want tuning too
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Justin Piszcz, (Sat Mar 24, 9:38 am)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Alan Cox, (Sat Mar 24, 11:43 am)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Jeff Garzik, (Mon Mar 26, 10:59 pm)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Justin Piszcz, (Tue Mar 27, 2:55 am)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Justin Piszcz, (Tue Mar 27, 3:30 am)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Mark Rustad, (Tue Mar 27, 11:18 am)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Jeff Garzik, (Tue Mar 27, 11:38 am)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Mark Rustad, (Tue Mar 27, 3:12 pm)
Re: Why is NCQ enabled by default by libata? (2.6.20), Ric Wheeler, (Sat Mar 31, 5:55 am)