Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> Yes, I agree - I don't think we presently have a way of avoiding having
> to send all of that uninteresting data down the pipe.

Have the kernel fork and exec a debug program "just in time" with the dying
process ptrace-attached in advance.  That program could then use ptrace() or
whatever to do the coredump.  I think Windows does something like that.

David
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/