Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -mm tree

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Tuesday, March 6, 2007 - 6:18 pm

On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 16:53 -0800, Dan Hecht wrote:

Yes it is. 

I just wanted to point out that you can use it until I'm awake enough to
implement it proper.


Right. But this applies only to deltas, as the conversion of absolute
time values gets ugly, i.e. 128bit math

IMO the paravirt interfaces should use nanoseconds anyway for both
readout and next event programming. That way the conversion is done in
the hypervisor once and the clocksources and clockevents are simple and
unified (except for the underlying hypervisor calls).


UNUSED:
The device is registered, but not used by any clockevents client

SHUTDOWN:
The device is registered, claimed by a clockevents client, but
momentarily not active.

The clock events device can treat UNUSED and SHUTDOWN basically in the
same way.

	tglx


-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Mar 6, 5:24 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Thomas Gleixner, (Tue Mar 6, 6:18 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Mar 6, 10:10 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 10:41 am)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 11:28 am)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 11:35 am)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 12:05 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 1:11 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 2:07 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 2:08 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 3:05 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 4:33 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 4:36 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 5:19 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 5:38 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Mar 7, 6:23 pm)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Mar 8, 1:41 am)
Re: hardwired VMI crap , Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 8, 2:10 am)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Zachary Amsden, (Thu Mar 8, 3:06 am)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Thomas Gleixner, (Thu Mar 8, 4:09 am)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Chris Wright, (Thu Mar 8, 11:35 am)
Re: + stupid-hack-to-make-mainline-build.patch added to -m ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Mar 8, 12:42 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Zachary Amsden, (Thu Mar 8, 1:46 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 8, 2:13 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Andi Kleen, (Thu Mar 8, 2:39 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Zachary Amsden, (Thu Mar 8, 3:17 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 8, 3:33 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Ingo Molnar, (Thu Mar 8, 3:42 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Zachary Amsden, (Thu Mar 8, 3:58 pm)
Re: hardwired VMI crap, Zachary Amsden, (Thu Mar 8, 4:39 pm)