Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n'

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Thursday, March 8, 2007 - 10:14 am

On Wednesday 07 March 2007 21:45, Dave Jiang wrote:

We went through this several times. kgdb has no business to poke 
into kernel private macros like this and it shouldn't do that. 
So fixing kgdb to not require touching the context switch is the right
change.

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n', Dave Jiang, (Wed Mar 7, 1:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n', Andi Kleen, (Thu Mar 8, 10:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n', Dave Jiang, (Thu Mar 8, 10:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n', Andi Kleen, (Thu Mar 8, 11:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n', Tom Rini, (Thu Mar 8, 11:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64 RESTORE_CONTEXT missing '\n', Andi Kleen, (Thu Mar 8, 3:36 pm)
Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get ..., Sergei Shtylyov, (Tue Apr 17, 11:37 am)
Re: Permanent Kgdb integration into the kernel - lets get ..., Sergei Shtylyov, (Tue Apr 17, 11:45 am)