Hi Dave,

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007 15:22:09 -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:48:59PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
>  > +	u8  val;
>  > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  > +	acpi_ut_acquire_mutex(ACPI_MTX_INTERPRETER);
>  > +#endif
>  >  	outb(reg, data->addr + ADDR_REG_OFFSET);
>  > -	return inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
>  > +	val = inb(data->addr + DATA_REG_OFFSET);
>  > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
>  > +	acpi_ut_release_mutex(ACPI_MTX_INTERPRETER);
>  > +#endif
>  > +	return val;
>  > ... deletia, more of the same.
> 
> it'd probably end up a lot cleaner to #define them to empty macros
> in the !ACPI case in acpi/acpi.h and just #include it unconditionally.

Sure, the implementation details can be refined later. I'm only trying
to see what can be done for now.

-- 
Jean Delvare
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/