Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Nigel Cunningham
Date: Tuesday, May 1, 2007 - 4:54 am

Hi.

On Tue, 2007-05-01 at 13:10 +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
105).

Yeah. It turns out that I was still on WS 6 beta 1. Upgrading to beta 2
made the problem go away.

Regards,

Nigel
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon Apr 30, 10:42 pm)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Jeff Chua, (Mon Apr 30, 11:13 pm)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Nigel Cunningham, (Mon Apr 30, 11:33 pm)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Michael Gerdau, (Tue May 1, 12:24 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 1, 12:36 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue May 1, 4:09 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Jan Engelhardt, (Tue May 1, 4:10 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 1, 4:54 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Jeff Chua, (Tue May 1, 5:51 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Mark Lord, (Tue May 1, 6:46 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Arjan van de Ven, (Tue May 1, 7:57 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 1, 8:09 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Nigel Cunningham, (Tue May 1, 8:14 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Petr Vandrovec, (Wed May 2, 2:30 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri May 4, 4:40 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Zachary Amsden, (Fri May 4, 8:08 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Eric W. Biederman, (Fri May 4, 1:14 pm)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Zachary Amsden, (Fri May 4, 2:04 pm)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Christoph Hellwig, (Sat May 5, 2:56 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., John Anthony Kazos Jr., (Sat May 5, 11:06 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Valdis.Kletnieks, (Sun May 6, 12:16 am)
Re: VMware, x86_64 and 2.6.21., Christoph Hellwig, (Sun May 6, 4:08 am)