On Wed, 2 May 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:

quoted text
> On 5/2/07, Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> > I am the one who has to maintain SLAB and SLUB it seems and I have been
> > dealing with the trio SLAB, SLOB and SLUB for awhile now. Its okay and it
> > will be much easier once the cleanups are in.
> 
> And then there's patches such as kmemleak which would need to target
> all three. Plus it doesn't really make sense for users to select
> between three competiting implementations. Please don't take away our
> high hopes of getting rid of mm/slab.c Christoph =)

SLUB supports kmemleak (actually its quite improved). Switch debugging on 
and try

cat /sys/slab/kmalloc-128/alloc_calls.

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/