Re: gmail is a bit too popular..

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Satyam Sharma
Date: Monday, May 7, 2007 - 9:29 am

On 5/7/07, John Anthony Kazos Jr. <jakj@j-a-k-j.com> wrote:

Aargh ... what did us poor folk do to deserve this? I understand ~2000
of those Gmail users are only spectators, but most others don't have a
choice. In my case, my university doesn't allow mailboxes to go beyond
a certain limit and only a couple of weeks worth of lkml would eat
that up. And I suspect other free web mail servers that offer 3 GB of
space too would be equally slower. But I do hope someone from Google
listened to this -- half a second per recipient ... *sucks*.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
gmail is a bit too popular.., Matti Aarnio, (Mon May 7, 7:55 am)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., John Anthony Kazos Jr., (Mon May 7, 8:03 am)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Matti Aarnio, (Mon May 7, 8:35 am)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Satyam Sharma, (Mon May 7, 9:29 am)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Willy Tarreau, (Mon May 7, 1:18 pm)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Martin Bligh, (Mon May 7, 1:21 pm)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., David Miller, (Mon May 7, 1:44 pm)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Matti Aarnio, (Mon May 7, 2:19 pm)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Adrian Bunk, (Mon May 7, 11:43 pm)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., David Woodhouse, (Mon Jun 4, 3:55 am)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Matti Aarnio, (Mon Jun 4, 5:10 am)
Re: gmail is a bit too popular.., Adrian Bunk, (Mon Jun 4, 5:27 am)