Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

view
thread

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

From: Alan Cox

Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil

Date: Wednesday, May 9, 2007 - 6:36 am

> Thus, any reliance on type-qualifying an object that represents an atomic 
quoted text> or locking primitive on the keyword 'volatile' is misplaced.

arch/foo is generally implementation specific code.
-
unsubscribe noticeTo unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware defi ..., Paul Sokolovsky, (Mon Apr 30, 10:08 pm)

Re: [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware ..., Andrew Morton, (Mon Apr 30, 11:56 pm)

Re: [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware ..., Alan Cox, (Tue May 1, 3:27 am)

Re: [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware ..., Paul Sokolovsky, (Tue May 1, 5:04 am)

Re: [RFC, PATCH 2/4] SoC base drivers: ASIC3 SoC hardware ..., Jamey Hicks, (Tue May 1, 5:21 am)

[RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 12:14 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 12:18 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Krzysztof Halasa, (Tue May 8, 1:00 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Satyam Sharma, (Tue May 8, 1:07 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 1:20 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 8, 2:05 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Krzysztof Halasa, (Tue May 8, 2:10 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeff Garzik, (Tue May 8, 2:16 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 8, 2:20 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeff Garzik, (Tue May 8, 2:25 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 2:26 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 2:27 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 2:29 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 8, 2:37 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 2:59 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 8, 3:04 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 3:19 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue May 8, 3:29 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 3:35 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 4:09 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 4:13 pm)

[PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 4:34 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 4:54 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 5:00 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 5:06 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil , Jonathan Corbet, (Tue May 8, 6:47 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 7:08 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Tue May 8, 7:38 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Tue May 8, 8:15 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Stefan Richter, (Wed May 9, 1:50 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Alan Cox, (Wed May 9, 2:21 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Nick Piggin, (Wed May 9, 2:26 am)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Johannes Stezenbach, (Wed May 9, 2:43 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Wed May 9, 3:25 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Alan Cox, (Wed May 9, 6:31 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Alan Cox, (Wed May 9, 6:36 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Randy Dunlap, (Wed May 9, 8:52 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Wed May 9, 11:41 am)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Satyam Sharma, (Wed May 9, 12:04 pm)

Re: [RFC/PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Satyam Sharma, (Wed May 9, 12:34 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Alan Cox, (Wed May 9, 1:23 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, David Rientjes, (Wed May 9, 1:25 pm)

Re: [PATCH] doc: volatile considered evil, Rob Landley, (Wed May 9, 3:47 pm)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Greg KH	Og dreams of kernels
Jens Axboe	[PATCH 31/33] Fusion: sg chaining support
Arnd Bergmann	Re: finding your own dead "CONFIG_" variables
Mark Brown	[PATCH 2/2] Subject: natsemi: Allow users to disable workaround for DspCfg reset
Tony Breeds	[LGUEST] Look in object dir for .config
git:
Brian Downing	Re: Git in a Nutshell guide
John Benes	Re: master has some toys
Matthias Lederhofer	[PATCH 4/7] introduce GIT_WORK_TREE to specify the work tree
Alexander Sulfrian	[RFC/PATCH] RE: git calls SSH_ASKPASS even if DISPLAY is not set
Junio C Hamano	Re: Rss produced by git is not valid xml?