On Jun 17, 2007, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

quoted text
> On Sun, 17 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:

quoted text
>> /me hands Linus a mirror

quoted text
> "I'm a damn handsome dude, ain't I?"

Heh.  I beg to differ ;-)

quoted text
>> Serious, what's so hard to understand about:

quoted text
> You're talking about something totally different.

No, I'm not.  You can say tivoization is *good* however much you like.
This doesn't dispute in any way my claim that no tivoization would be
*better*, that you'd get contributions from the people that, because
of tivoization, don't feel compelled to develop and contribute,
because they can't use the fruits of their efforts in the device where
they would be most useful for them.

quoted text
> 	What Tivo did is *good* in my opinion!

quoted text
> Can't you get that through your skull?

No.  I disagree.  We can agree to disagree on that.

quoted text
> They gave the software back! Be happy! They *followed* the rules. They 
> *followed* the tit-for-tat.

But they removed incentive for far more users to do so.  So you get
fewer contributions than you could without tivoization.

"Can't you get that through your skull?" :-)

-- 
Alexandre Oliva         http://www.lsd.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
FSF Latin America Board Member         http://www.fsfla.org/
Red Hat Compiler Engineer   aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist  oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/