Hi!

quoted text
> > That would just save reading the directories. Not sure
> > it helps that much. Much better would be actually if it didn't stat the 
> > individual files (and force their dentries/inodes in). I bet it does that to 
> > find out if they are directories or not. But in a modern system it could just 
> > check the type in the dirent on file systems that support 
> > that and not do a stat. Then you would get much less dentries/inodes.
>  
> FWIW, find(1) does *not* stat non-directories (and neither would this
> approach).  So it's just dentries for directories and you can't realistically
> skip those.  OK, you could - if you had banned cross-directory rename
> for directories and propagated "dirty since last look" towards root (note
> that it would be a boolean, not a timestamp).  Then we could skip unchanged
> subtrees completely...

Could we help it a little from kernel and set 'dirty since last look'
on directory renames?

I mean, this is not only updatedb. KDE startup is limited by this,
too. It would be nice to have effective 'what change in tree'
operation.
							Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/