Hi,
On Mon, 16 Jul 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text > yes, the weight multiplier 1.25, but the actual difference in CPU
> utilization, when running two CPU intense tasks, is ~10%:
>
> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
> 8246 mingo 20 0 1576 244 196 R 55 0.0 0:11.96 loop
> 8247 mingo 21 1 1576 244 196 R 45 0.0 0:10.52 loop
>
> so the first task 'wins' +10% CPU utilization (relative to the 50% it
> had before), the second task 'loses' -10% CPU utilization (relative to
> the 50% it had before).
As soon as you add another loop the difference changes again, while it's
always correct to say it gets 25% more cpu time (which I still think is a
little too much).
bye, Roman
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
clam , Andy Whitcroft , (Tue Jul 10, 5:37 am)
Re: [PATCH] CFS: Fix missing digit off in wmult table , Roman Zippel , (Mon Jul 16, 3:18 am)