How to handle patches that cross maintainers?

Previous thread: Fusion MPT regression, fixed or not? by Matt Sealey on Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 12:19 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: Re: PKTCDVD related bugzilla bugs by Peter Osterlund on Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 2:22 am. (2 messages)
From: Kumar Gala
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 2:01 am

Andrew,

I was hoping to get your input on how to handle patches that cross  
maintainers.  I've got a patch that is pretty PPC specific, but  
happens to touch some drivers as well.

Here's the diffstat to get a rough idea:

arch/powerpc/kernel/io.c                |   12 ++++++------
arch/powerpc/mm/hash_native_64.c        |    2 +-
arch/powerpc/mm/stab.c                  |    4 ++--
drivers/ide/pci/scc_pata.c              |    4 ++--
drivers/media/dvb/bt8xx/bt878.h         |    5 ++---
drivers/serial/cpm_uart/cpm_uart_core.c |    2 +-
include/asm-powerpc/system.h            |    2 +-
7 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

Now, I've had this issue before w/o any good sense on how to handle it.

Suggestions?

- k
-

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 2:38 am

Well, assuming that all the changes are interdependent and cannot be split
up: send it to the relevant maintainers, gather the acks and merge it up
yourself.

-

From: Christoph Hellwig
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 7:13 am

From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Date: Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 8:01 am

The better is to copy all of us and wait for some time to allow each
maintainer to ack or comment the changeset, if needed.

Please c/c me for any changes on /drivers/media stuff.

Cheers,
Mauro

-

Previous thread: Fusion MPT regression, fixed or not? by Matt Sealey on Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 12:19 am. (2 messages)

Next thread: Re: PKTCDVD related bugzilla bugs by Peter Osterlund on Tuesday, July 3, 2007 - 2:22 am. (2 messages)